In the realm of professional management , there are acts of wrongdoing that slip through the cracks , and then there are stories that question the values of an organization . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, falls squarely in the latter category — a tale of presumed malfeasance that significantly damages the reputation of a single manager but calls into question over the enterprise’s integrity.
In spite of numerous complaints, Collins has kept his position , visibly unaffected by the furor surrounding him . How has this been permitted to continue ? What does this say about the company’s commitment to responsibility ? According to sources , Collins’ history of questionable behavior began with breaches of the business principles, but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it escalated into a series of ethical breaches that has left team members disenchanted and clients puzzled .
During a leadership training program — supposedly designed to boost managerial skills —David Collins allegedly transformed what should have been a professional opportunity into a chain of irresponsible incidents . Sources claim he spent business-funded trips pursuing romantic liaisons , a clear breach of Ventia’s business principles , all while his loved ones stayed unaware .
But the indiscretions didn’t end with romantic pursuits . One of the more shocking revelations involves his alleged exploitation of company IT systems to transmit indecent visuals to women—a clear misuse of professional tools and a breakdown of professionalism . His reckless employment of Microsoft Teams to distribute risqué communications—including icons to boast about infidelities — reveals a character of a man indifferent to the outcomes . Following these digital overtures , Collins allegedly progressed his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in romantic liaisons with an employee on multiple occasions during company hours , despite his own marital status and her having a spouse . This obvious misappropriation of company time and resources contravened corporate etiquette but led to familial breakdowns — producing a wake of personal ruin that extended outside of the organizational context.
In what way can this behavior be permitted to go on? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly broken every professional standard is still receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The rationale, it appears, lies in a problematic dearth of accountability within the firm . Concerns have been voiced, yet Collins operates without restraint .
This absence of retribution broadcasts an ominous signal : that title and position within the enterprise can protect individuals from consequences . It promotes a hostile office atmosphere , demoralizes employees , and ultimately damages the firm’s kerikeri ventia reputation .